<$BlogRSDURL$>

You've got to begin with who you know you are to be a revolution. — Jars of Clay

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Can I publish this?

His name is Jim 

Watch what you say to ushers at theaters in Versailles, Ky. I just mentioned to a friend of mine that I refer to her husband as "My friend Jim, the crazy liberal," when she handed me a program to "The Lion in Winter," and low and behold, now you can find him at http://jimthecrazyliberal.blogspot.com/. I'll add a link, like that's going to help him. He comes to the game with a bigger audience than I have.

cope, it would help if you posted more than every eight months

Why yes it would. I'll give that a try. And you give Jim a try.

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

Can we leave Nazis to Germans in the 1940s? 

It started happening about a year ago. I started noticing the pretty careless use of the term Nazi by media folks and public officials. Here in Lexington, Ky. we had just enacted a smoking ban, and some radio folks were referring to police out enforcing the ban as using "Nazi" tactics. Excuse me? Were they throwing people up against the wall? Were they putting them on trains and sending them off the concentration camps? Were they doing ghastly medical experiments on them because they lit up in the wrong place? No, they were accompanying health department officials who took on the task of approaching bar owners and smokers. The Nazis. The most recent example, of course, is the senator from Illinois. Of course, talking about U.S. treatment of prisoners raises the stakes a bit, but does calling someone a Nazi or comparing them to Hitler do anybody any good? Does it add to the discourse? No. It's a hot button word that is rarely applicable in most situations. Let's leave addressing people as Nazi's to Germans in the 1940s and come up with some better adjectives to make our points.

Monday, June 28, 2004

Going negative on Fahrenheit 9/11 

So, I had an eight hour drive today and indulged in my unfortunate habit of listening to AM talk radio on the road. Now today was the day the United States handed sovereignty back to Iraq two days early. What do you think the major topic of conversation was on conservative talk radio? Of course, it was bashing Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" following it's unprecidented opening weekend. Why crow about a dubious Republican victory when you can sink your teeth into a favorite conservative whipping boy.
The funny thing was that at least three of the conservative talk show hosts I tuned in had not even seen the movie -- Rush Limbaugh, Neal Bortz and Glenn Beck. At least a few of their premises was that they didn't want to give Michael Moore their money. Well, you know what, it's not your money. It's your friggin' job to see the movie if you're going to get on the air and bash it. Put it on your EIB expense report, Rush. If you know you will spend a few hours on national radio commenting on a movie, the least you can do is see it so you know EXACTLY what you're talking about. Of course, because they hadn't seen the movie, the yakkers were getting things wrong, getting things out of context. One of the most common mistakes was regarding the Saudis and members of the bin Laden family that beat a quick retreat out of the United States after 9/11. Most people get hung up on whether Moore claims they were flown out before U.S. airspace was reopened. The actual point Moore is making, with the commentary of a retired FBI director, is that these people should have been questioned thoroughly before they left the country. But they weren't, and they were even aided in their departure by the U.S. government. I heard one commentator call this a recruiting film for terrorists. Get real. These are all arguments by people who feel there is one way of looking at the United States, and if you don't see it THEIR way, you're a big, fat, pinko commie. Agree or disagree, Michael Moore is a passionate American deeply concerned about the direction of his country, and the fact that conservatives are taking so much time to bash "Fahrenheit 9/11" only exemplifies how much it scares them. It also reiterates the true roots of most conservative media: It is not about supporting anything as much as it is about tearing things down. So it should not be surprising that conservatives would take a day when they could crow about a significant event in the Iraq war and use it to bash someone. We should have expected it.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?